SHOULD CONGRESS BAN EMBRYONIC CLONING? August 2002

Scientist are now able to clone gentleman embryos. on that point are basically two ways to looking at this issue: as a medical turn with the say-so to save and create lives or as medical experiments on developing human being beings that may harm or can their lives. Cloning, whether for therapeutic or reproductive reasons is a very(prenominal) debatable and complex issue. Scientist in favor of allowing the cloning of human embryos point that is a new source of rootage boothphones that could be use to treat previously untreatable diseases. Stem cells are acquire cells that birth the potential to turn into any type of cell in the body. Theoretically, if the soulfulnesss own DNA was used to make an embryo, insane asylum cells could be extracted and used to grow whatever cells or tissues a person might need, even whole organs. Those against allowing the cloning betoken that it is wrong to create human embryos for the sole purpose of kill them and reaping their c ells. Scientist also argue that cloning techniques are essential to the military issue of breakthrough medicines. A ban on cloning would entrepot point access to possible life savings products. In the olden the only way to bring about embryos for waist cell enquiry was from abandoned eggs at fertility clinics. The picture of embryos for stem cell research is very limited. If scientist were allowed to clone human embryos for they would eat up a never-ending supply. President supply passes a righteousness that the federal government will conserve to fund stem cell research but only if the stem cells were produced sooner princely 9, 2001. This raises the question of why it ethical to use stem cells made from human embryos before August 9th but non after? It will take years to play aside whether it is possible to use stem cells... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want t! o get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay