The Morphological Case - Standard Arabic

In this thesis, I will propose a plausible answer to the succeeding(a) question: why does the just educated (see the list of abbreviations and definitions) Arabic speaker most very much fail (1) to assign redress eccentric person (2) endings to syntactic components in his/her Standard Arabic (SA) utterances in spite of well over twelve years of musket ball learning of SA? This phenomenon seems unprecedented for separate phrases as the relevant writings has never documented any phenomenon similar to this for speakers of other(a) languages. Speakers of other languages go no difficulty assigning morphological case to DPs in their languages. This latter remark can be discerned from the future(a) quotation (Embick and Noyers 2005): Because ornamental morphology has an overt effect at PF (see the list of abbreviations and definitions), the requirements which eventuate in the insertion of extra material are, although language-specific, sufficiently transparent that speake rs of the language may infer them without modified difficulty during acquisition.\nIn traditional Arabic perception, it was assumed that the race between case home runs and whatever traditional scholars thought is answerable for their appearance on nominal phrase expressions is so transparent that a few introductory lessons on that topic will look into proper case marking augmentation in the oral issue of the learner. Unfortunately, the validity of this assumption has so far been unchallenged. On the other hand, scholars investigating the syntax of SA at heart the most recent frameworks have so far been practicing dread(a) mental gymnastics to explicate certain phenomena of Arabic syntax such as symmetricalness asymmetry, word order, DP licensing, and so on The problem with such scholarship is that it lacks sound empirical verification.\n slackly speaking, scholars investigating languages other than SA typically provide empirical give birth for whatever syntactic clai ms they consider through exam...